Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
J Glob Health ; 11: 05022, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1478403

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study sought to determine the presence of SARS-CoV-2 virus on surfaces that trainees and faculty of an academic eye clinic came into contact with during daily life at the time of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City. METHODS: This cross-sectional analysis involved collection of at least two samples by teams on four different days (November 9, 2020 - December 18, 2020) using sterile swabs (Puritan HydraFlock, Garden Grove, CA). Collection sites were grouped into four zones depending on proximity and amount of time personnel spent there. Samples were transported to the laboratory in transport medium and RNA was extracted using the QIAamp DSP Viral RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD). Presence of viral RNA was investigated using the Luna Universal Probe One-step RT-qPCR kit (New England Biolabs, Ipwsich, MA). RESULTS: 834 samples were submitted. Two were positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. The first was a sample from a patient bathroom sink handle in the main emergency department. The second was a nasal swab sample from a staff member who had been assigned to collect samples. Prior to this positive result, this asymptomatic staff member had tested positive for COVID-19, had quarantined for two weeks, and had received a negative test. CONCLUSION: Though COVID-19 is currently widespread in the United States, this study shows that health care personnel working in New York City at the Columbia University Irving Medical Center have a low chance of encountering viral RNA on surfaces they are in close contact with during daily life.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , RNA, Viral , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , New York City/epidemiology , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
2.
J Glaucoma ; 30(8): 750-757, 2021 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1358504

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The temporary cessation and profound changes in ophthalmic care delivery that occurred as a result of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic have yet to be fully understood. Our objective is to assess patients' self-reported impact of health care lockdown measures on their fears and anxieties during the crisis period of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City. METHODS: We conducted a digital, self-reported, patient care survey distributed by an e-mail at Columbia University's Department of Ophthalmology outpatient faculty practice. Inclusion criteria were age greater than or equal to 18 years, a diagnosis of either retinal disease or glaucoma, and a canceled or rescheduled ophthalmology established patient appointment during the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City. Patients without an e-mail address listed in their electronic medical records were excluded. The survey occurred between March 2, 2020, to May 30, 2020. Primary measures were survey responses to assess key areas of patient anxiety or concern during the pandemic including the safety of care delivery in a COVID pandemic, difficulties contacting or being seen by their ophthalmologist, concern of vision loss or disease progression, and concern over missed or access to treatments. Secondary measures were correlating survey response to factors such as visual acuity, intraocular pressure, diagnosis, disease severity, follow-up urgency, recent treatments, and diagnostic testing data. RESULTS: Of the 2594 surveys sent out, 510 (19.66%) were completed. Over 95% of patients were at least as concerned as in normal circumstances about their ocular health during the peak of the pandemic. Overall, 76% of respondents were more concerned than normal that they could not be seen by their ophthalmologist soon enough. Increased concern over ocular health, disease progression, and access to care all showed positive correlations (P<0.05) with worse disease severity as measured with testing such as visual fields and optical coherence tomography. In addition, 55% of patients were afraid of contracting COVID-19 during an office visit. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: We found a majority of our patients were concerned about limitations in access to ophthalmic care and were fearful of disease progression. In addition, we found a number of demographic and clinical factors that correlated with increased anxiety in our patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Glaucoma , Communicable Disease Control , Humans , Intraocular Pressure , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg ; 37(4): e149-e151, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1269617

ABSTRACT

A 79-year-old male was hospitalized for respiratory failure secondary to coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia. Approximately 6 hours after initiating proning, left globe subluxation with darkening of the superior sclera consistent with tache noir was noted. The left globe was thought to be hypotonus secondary to ciliary body shut down after a prolonged period of high intraocular pressure. The globe was reduced in the supine position with gentle traction of the eyelids. Over the next 24 hours, the left intraocular pressure improved to 10 mm Hg, and the tache-noir de la sclérotique resolved. The authors report the first known case of globe subluxation secondary to proning.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Aged , Ciliary Body , Humans , Intraocular Pressure , Male , SARS-CoV-2 , Sclera
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL